FOURTH TASK

Dangerous dogs or bad education of the society?

Several studies have shown that dog attacks are not related to a certain breed, but to the way they are raised or have been victims of abuse, abuse and abandonment before. The attacks of dogs are not only due to the so-called Potentially Dangerous Dogs, but any dog ​​can get to bite before certain stimulate of the surrounding environment, either by instinct of its own protection or its owner.

Moreover, many of these breeds of dogs are attributed traits of loyalty and protection, acting as "caretakers" for the sweetness with which they treat children.

It is important that society is linked more with the responsibility of the owner of the dog and not so much in it, that it is completely free of guilt, leaving the stereotypes.

We must educate in responsible tenure and sanction irresponsible owners, if necessary, but without prohibitions that directly or indirectly affect dogs, since they are not responsible or are not to blame for our actions.

For this reason, I consider that there are no potentially dangerous dogs, but potentially irresponsible owners. It seems logical to think that it is about the latter over who should treat the regulations, as well as the coercive and sanctioning measures.

Every decade we bring evil to a different breed, Pit Bull Terrier, Staffordshire Bull Terrier, American Staffordshire Terrier, Rottweiler, among others. When humanity accepted the guilt?

Personally I have a so-called PPP by society and I can attest that since childhood it has been as sweet and faithful as any other dog. The love and protection felt with me as owner and with my family as their support makes them have the tranquility and certainty of not feeling the need to attack someone for being deprived of their freedom or being trained to attack third parties.

It's time to leave the stereotypes aside. have an open mind.